Re: Hadidi AT et al., The Natural (non-invasive) Erection Test: Is 2it a reliable alternative to the artificial erection test? Journal of Pediatric Urology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.009.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012
- Published
- 2023-10-20
- Container
- J Pediatr Urol
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012,
title = {Re: Hadidi AT et al., The Natural (non-invasive) Erection Test: Is 2it a reliable alternative to the artificial erection test? Journal of Pediatric Urology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.009.},
author = {Hadidi AT.},
year = {2023},
journal = {J Pediatr Urol},
doi = {10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Re: Hadidi AT et al., The Natural (non-invasive) Erection Test: Is 2it a reliable alternative to the artificial erection test? Journal of Pediatric Urology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.009. AU - Hadidi AT. PY - 2023 JO - J Pediatr Urol DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012 ER -
APA
AT., H. (2023). Re: Hadidi AT et al., The Natural (non-invasive) Erection Test: Is 2it a reliable alternative to the artificial erection test? Journal of Pediatric Urology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.009.. J Pediatr Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.10.012
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T14:22:09.906Z