Percutaneous mechanical atherothrombectomy versus arterial bypass surgery for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: a budget impact analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- Container
- J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616,
title = {Percutaneous mechanical atherothrombectomy versus arterial bypass surgery for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: a budget impact analysis.},
author = {Stanberry B and Maclean D and Elbasty A.},
year = {2025},
journal = {J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv},
doi = {10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Percutaneous mechanical atherothrombectomy versus arterial bypass surgery for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: a budget impact analysis. AU - Stanberry B AU - Maclean D AU - Elbasty A. PY - 2025 JO - J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv DO - 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616 ER -
APA
B, S., D, M., & A., E. (2025). Percutaneous mechanical atherothrombectomy versus arterial bypass surgery for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: a budget impact analysis.. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103616
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T05:45:35.153Z