Revision risk of cross-linked versus non-crosslinked polyethylene in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 63,502 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Nguyen TQ, Gill DRJ, Corfield S, McCaul M, Cass B

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003
Published
2026 Aug 21
Container
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003,
  title = {Revision risk of cross-linked versus non-crosslinked polyethylene in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 63,502 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.},
  author = {Nguyen TQ and Gill DRJ and Corfield S and McCaul M and Cass B},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery},
  doi = {10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Revision risk of cross-linked versus non-crosslinked polyethylene in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 63,502 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
AU  - Nguyen TQ
AU  - Gill DRJ
AU  - Corfield S
AU  - McCaul M
AU  - Cass B
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
DO  - 10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003
ER  - 

APA

TQ, N., DRJ, G., S, C., M, M., & B, C. (2026). Revision risk of cross-linked versus non-crosslinked polyethylene in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 63,502 cases from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2026.08.003

Source records