Cognitive Task Analysis Versus Conventional Training for Invasive Medical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129
- Published
- 2026 Aug 31
- Container
- Journal of surgical education
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129,
title = {Cognitive Task Analysis Versus Conventional Training for Invasive Medical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.},
author = {Portes KP and de Oliveira GC and Maia RBS and Porto BC and Artifon ELA and Otoch JP and da Cruz JAS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of surgical education},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Cognitive Task Analysis Versus Conventional Training for Invasive Medical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AU - Portes KP AU - de Oliveira GC AU - Maia RBS AU - Porto BC AU - Artifon ELA AU - Otoch JP AU - da Cruz JAS PY - 2026 JO - Journal of surgical education DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129 ER -
APA
KP, P., GC, D. O., RBS, M., BC, P., ELA, A., JP, O., & JAS, D. C. (2026). Cognitive Task Analysis Versus Conventional Training for Invasive Medical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. Journal of surgical education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2026.104129
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:45:39.529Z