Functional outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608
- Published
- 2026 Aug 25
- Container
- The Knee
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608,
title = {Functional outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Ruhle V and Rudran B and Leung B and Merle C and Murray D and Price A and Alvand A},
year = {2026},
journal = {The Knee},
doi = {10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Functional outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Ruhle V AU - Rudran B AU - Leung B AU - Merle C AU - Murray D AU - Price A AU - Alvand A PY - 2026 JO - The Knee DO - 10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608 ER -
APA
V, R., B, R., B, L., C, M., D, M., A, P., & A, A. (2026). Functional outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. The Knee. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104608
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:51:04.392Z