Testing age progression technique: evaluation of reliability and accuracy
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731
- Published
- 2025-11
- Container
- Legal Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731,
title = {Testing age progression technique: evaluation of reliability and accuracy},
author = {Laura Donato and Michele Treglia and Douglas H. Ubelaker and Margherita Pallocci and Chiara De Cagna and Anna Laura Santunione and Rossana Cecchi and Jessika Camatti and Pierluigi Passalacqua and Luigi Tonino Marsella},
year = {2025},
journal = {Legal Medicine},
doi = {10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Testing age progression technique: evaluation of reliability and accuracy AU - Laura Donato AU - Michele Treglia AU - Douglas H. Ubelaker AU - Margherita Pallocci AU - Chiara De Cagna AU - Anna Laura Santunione AU - Rossana Cecchi AU - Jessika Camatti AU - Pierluigi Passalacqua AU - Luigi Tonino Marsella PY - 2025 JO - Legal Medicine DO - 10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731 ER -
APA
Donato, L., Treglia, M., Ubelaker, D. H., Pallocci, M., Cagna, C. D., Santunione, A. L., Cecchi, R., Camatti, J., Passalacqua, P., & Marsella, L. T. (2025). Testing age progression technique: evaluation of reliability and accuracy. Legal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102731
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T11:15:56.231Z