[Comparison of the concept of "responsibility" in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice].
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018
- Published
- 2016 Jun
- Container
- Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018,
title = {[Comparison of the concept of "responsibility" in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice].},
author = {Galland D and Jonas C and Jardri R and Wilquin M and Cottencin O and Thomas P and Rolland B},
year = {2016},
journal = {Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)},
doi = {10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - [Comparison of the concept of "responsibility" in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice]. AU - Galland D AU - Jonas C AU - Jardri R AU - Wilquin M AU - Cottencin O AU - Thomas P AU - Rolland B PY - 2016 JO - Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) DO - 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018 ER -
APA
D, G., C, J., R, J., M, W., O, C., P, T., & B, R. (2016). [Comparison of the concept of "responsibility" in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice].. Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:35:20.216Z