« Le signe de Koplik est pathognomonique de la rougeole » et « Chez un adulte l’azoospermie après orchite ourlienne est définitive » : vrai ou faux ?
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020
- Published
- 2020-10
- Container
- La Presse Médicale Formation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020,
title = {« Le signe de Koplik est pathognomonique de la rougeole » et « Chez un adulte l’azoospermie après orchite ourlienne est définitive » : vrai ou faux ?},
author = {Cyrielle Rodier and Audrey Glatre and Béatrice Delepine and Yohan N’Guyen},
year = {2020},
journal = {La Presse Médicale Formation},
doi = {10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - « Le signe de Koplik est pathognomonique de la rougeole » et « Chez un adulte l’azoospermie après orchite ourlienne est définitive » : vrai ou faux ? AU - Cyrielle Rodier AU - Audrey Glatre AU - Béatrice Delepine AU - Yohan N’Guyen PY - 2020 JO - La Presse Médicale Formation DO - 10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020 ER -
APA
Rodier, C., Glatre, A., Delepine, B., & N’Guyen, Y. (2020). « Le signe de Koplik est pathognomonique de la rougeole » et « Chez un adulte l’azoospermie après orchite ourlienne est définitive » : vrai ou faux ?. La Presse Médicale Formation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpmfor.2020.09.020
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:13:24.236Z