Oxidation method affects radiocarbon analysis of natural solid samples: Implications for elemental analyzer vs. closed tube combustion.

Lee SC, Lee GH, Koh H, Lee EJ, Yu BY, Hur J, Kim S, Shin KH, Oh NH

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160
Published
2026 Jul 21
Container
Marine pollution bulletin
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160,
  title = {Oxidation method affects radiocarbon analysis of natural solid samples: Implications for elemental analyzer vs. closed tube combustion.},
  author = {Lee SC and Lee GH and Koh H and Lee EJ and Yu BY and Hur J and Kim S and Shin KH and Oh NH},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Marine pollution bulletin},
  doi = {10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Oxidation method affects radiocarbon analysis of natural solid samples: Implications for elemental analyzer vs. closed tube combustion.
AU  - Lee SC
AU  - Lee GH
AU  - Koh H
AU  - Lee EJ
AU  - Yu BY
AU  - Hur J
AU  - Kim S
AU  - Shin KH
AU  - Oh NH
PY  - 2026
JO  - Marine pollution bulletin
DO  - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160
ER  - 

APA

SC, L., GH, L., H, K., EJ, L., BY, Y., J, H., S, K., KH, S., & NH, O. (2026). Oxidation method affects radiocarbon analysis of natural solid samples: Implications for elemental analyzer vs. closed tube combustion.. Marine pollution bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.120160

Source records