The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755
- Published
- 2025 Dec
- Container
- Maturitas
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755,
title = {The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Ruffolo AF and Salvatore S and Torella M and Frigerio M and Soligo M and Rubod C and Lallemant M and Cosson M and Serati M and Braga A},
year = {2025},
journal = {Maturitas},
doi = {10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Ruffolo AF AU - Salvatore S AU - Torella M AU - Frigerio M AU - Soligo M AU - Rubod C AU - Lallemant M AU - Cosson M AU - Serati M AU - Braga A PY - 2025 JO - Maturitas DO - 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755 ER -
APA
AF, R., S, S., M, T., M, F., M, S., C, R., M, L., M, C., M, S., & A, B. (2025). The uterus debate in vaginal native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: Hysteropexy versus hysterectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Maturitas. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108755
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T09:37:59.692Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T09:37:59.695Z