Guaranteeing the quality and integrity of pork - An Australian case study.

Channon HA, D'Souza DN, Jarrett RG, Lee GSH, Watling RJ, Jolley JYC, Dunshea FR

DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030
Published: 2018 Oct
Container: Meat science
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030,
  title = {Guaranteeing the quality and integrity of pork - An Australian case study.},
  author = {Channon HA and D'Souza DN and Jarrett RG and Lee GSH and Watling RJ and Jolley JYC and Dunshea FR},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {Meat science},
  doi = {10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Guaranteeing the quality and integrity of pork - An Australian case study.
AU  - Channon HA
AU  - D'Souza DN
AU  - Jarrett RG
AU  - Lee GSH
AU  - Watling RJ
AU  - Jolley JYC
AU  - Dunshea FR
PY  - 2018
JO  - Meat science
DO  - 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030
ER  -

APA

HA, C., DN, D., RG, J., GSH, L., RJ, W., JYC, J., & FR, D. (2018). Guaranteeing the quality and integrity of pork - An Australian case study.. Meat science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.030

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:22:50.382Z