Comparison between accelerated and standard or sham rTMS in the treatment of depression: A systematic review.

Lefaucheur JP, Colzi C, Hollander E, Pampaloni I, Van Ameringen M, Baeken C, Fusar-Poli P, Arango C, Fontenelle LF, Batail JM, Brunoni AR, Nicolini H, Haffen E, Soriano-Mas C, Rodriguez CI, Dell'Osso BM, Vieta E, Sauvaget A, Szekely D, Mayer-Linderberg A, Denys D, Stein DJ, Drapier D, Voon V, Pallanti S.

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140
Published: 2025-04-17
Container: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140,
  title = {Comparison between accelerated and standard or sham rTMS in the treatment of depression: A systematic review.},
  author = {Lefaucheur JP and  Colzi C and  Hollander E and  Pampaloni I and  Van Ameringen M and  Baeken C and  Fusar-Poli P and  Arango C and  Fontenelle LF and  Batail JM and  Brunoni AR and  Nicolini H and  Haffen E and  Soriano-Mas C and  Rodriguez CI and  Dell'Osso BM and  Vieta E and  Sauvaget A and  Szekely D and  Mayer-Linderberg A and  Denys D and  Stein DJ and  Drapier D and  Voon V and  Pallanti S.},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Neurosci Biobehav Rev},
  doi = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison between accelerated and standard or sham rTMS in the treatment of depression: A systematic review.
AU  - Lefaucheur JP
AU  -  Colzi C
AU  -  Hollander E
AU  -  Pampaloni I
AU  -  Van Ameringen M
AU  -  Baeken C
AU  -  Fusar-Poli P
AU  -  Arango C
AU  -  Fontenelle LF
AU  -  Batail JM
AU  -  Brunoni AR
AU  -  Nicolini H
AU  -  Haffen E
AU  -  Soriano-Mas C
AU  -  Rodriguez CI
AU  -  Dell'Osso BM
AU  -  Vieta E
AU  -  Sauvaget A
AU  -  Szekely D
AU  -  Mayer-Linderberg A
AU  -  Denys D
AU  -  Stein DJ
AU  -  Drapier D
AU  -  Voon V
AU  -  Pallanti S.
PY  - 2025
JO  - Neurosci Biobehav Rev
DO  - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140
ER  -

APA

JP, L., C, C., E, H., I, P., M, V. A., C, B., P, F., C, A., LF, F., JM, B., AR, B., H, N., E, H., C, S., CI, R., BM, D., E, V., A, S., D, S., A, M., D, D., DJ, S., D, D., V, V., & S., P. (2025). Comparison between accelerated and standard or sham rTMS in the treatment of depression: A systematic review.. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106140

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:43:17.917Z
hal · retrieved 2026-09-26T11:43:17.936Z