Biased binomial assessment of cross-validated estimation of classification accuracies illustrated in diagnosis predictions.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004
- Published
- 2014
- Container
- NeuroImage. Clinical
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004,
title = {Biased binomial assessment of cross-validated estimation of classification accuracies illustrated in diagnosis predictions.},
author = {Noirhomme Q and Lesenfants D and Gomez F and Soddu A and Schrouff J and Garraux G and Luxen A and Phillips C and Laureys S},
year = {2014},
journal = {NeuroImage. Clinical},
doi = {10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Biased binomial assessment of cross-validated estimation of classification accuracies illustrated in diagnosis predictions. AU - Noirhomme Q AU - Lesenfants D AU - Gomez F AU - Soddu A AU - Schrouff J AU - Garraux G AU - Luxen A AU - Phillips C AU - Laureys S PY - 2014 JO - NeuroImage. Clinical DO - 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004 ER -
APA
Q, N., D, L., F, G., A, S., J, S., G, G., A, L., C, P., & S, L. (2014). Biased binomial assessment of cross-validated estimation of classification accuracies illustrated in diagnosis predictions.. NeuroImage. Clinical. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.04.004
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:06:16.927Z