Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231
- Published
- 2021-04
- Container
- Omega
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231,
title = {Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach},
author = {Stefan Creemers and Marc Lambrecht and Jeroen Beliën and Maud van den Broeke},
year = {2021},
journal = {Omega},
doi = {10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach AU - Stefan Creemers AU - Marc Lambrecht AU - Jeroen Beliën AU - Maud van den Broeke PY - 2021 JO - Omega DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231 ER -
APA
Creemers, S., Lambrecht, M., Beliën, J., & Broeke, M. V. D. (2021). Evaluation of appointment scheduling rules: A multi-performance measurement approach. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102231
Source records
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:00:57.923Z