Glaucoma in the UK Biobank: A Comparison of Diagnostic-Based versus Treatment-Based Definitions.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012
- Published
- 2026 Jun 17
- Container
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012,
title = {Glaucoma in the UK Biobank: A Comparison of Diagnostic-Based versus Treatment-Based Definitions.},
author = {Schierding W and Khoo A and Akeroyd E and Butterworth AS and Danesh J and Danesh-Meyer HV},
year = {2026},
journal = {Ophthalmology},
doi = {10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Glaucoma in the UK Biobank: A Comparison of Diagnostic-Based versus Treatment-Based Definitions. AU - Schierding W AU - Khoo A AU - Akeroyd E AU - Butterworth AS AU - Danesh J AU - Danesh-Meyer HV PY - 2026 JO - Ophthalmology DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012 ER -
APA
W, S., A, K., E, A., AS, B., J, D., & HV, D. (2026). Glaucoma in the UK Biobank: A Comparison of Diagnostic-Based versus Treatment-Based Definitions.. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2026.06.012
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:40:32.724Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:40:32.700Z