Optometrist-guided versus self-driven subjective refraction using tunable optics: quantifying the professional’s impact
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611
- Published
- 2026-07
- Container
- Journal of Optometry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611,
title = {Optometrist-guided versus self-driven subjective refraction using tunable optics: quantifying the professional’s impact},
author = {Raquel Salvador-Roger and Abinaya Priya Venkataraman and Vicente Micó and Alberto Domínguez-Vicent and José J. Esteve-Taboada},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of Optometry},
doi = {10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Optometrist-guided versus self-driven subjective refraction using tunable optics: quantifying the professional’s impact AU - Raquel Salvador-Roger AU - Abinaya Priya Venkataraman AU - Vicente Micó AU - Alberto Domínguez-Vicent AU - José J. Esteve-Taboada PY - 2026 JO - Journal of Optometry DO - 10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611 ER -
APA
Salvador-Roger, R., Venkataraman, A. P., Micó, V., Domínguez-Vicent, A., & Esteve-Taboada, J. J. (2026). Optometrist-guided versus self-driven subjective refraction using tunable optics: quantifying the professional’s impact. Journal of Optometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2026.100611
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:51:04.414Z