Estimated costs of intravenous vs subcutaneous pembrolizumab in perioperative head and neck cancer: subcutaneous administration is unlikely to reduce costs.

Patel AN, Wu SS, Colevas AD, Divi V.

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125
Published
2026-09-21
Container
Oral Oncol
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125,
  title = {Estimated costs of intravenous vs subcutaneous pembrolizumab in perioperative head and neck cancer: subcutaneous administration is unlikely to reduce costs.},
  author = {Patel AN and  Wu SS and  Colevas AD and  Divi V.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Oral Oncol},
  doi = {10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Estimated costs of intravenous vs subcutaneous pembrolizumab in perioperative head and neck cancer: subcutaneous administration is unlikely to reduce costs.
AU  - Patel AN
AU  -  Wu SS
AU  -  Colevas AD
AU  -  Divi V.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Oral Oncol
DO  - 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125
ER  - 

APA

AN, P., SS, W., AD, C., & V., D. (2026). Estimated costs of intravenous vs subcutaneous pembrolizumab in perioperative head and neck cancer: subcutaneous administration is unlikely to reduce costs.. Oral Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2026.108125

Source records