Efficacy, tolerability, and patient preference of indoor, simulated, or artificial daylight photodynamic therapy versus conventional lamp-based photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nouf M. Al-Otaibi, Merwi S. Alhadeyah, Abdulmuhsin H. Al-Rashid, Malak A. Alshamali, Reema Mohammad Aldhafeeri, Shaan AlGhanim, Alaa J. Alsaleh, Jood W. Almutairi, Danah T.H.Z. Almutairi, Abdullah M. Alharran

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643
Published: 2026-10
Container: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643,
  title = {Efficacy, tolerability, and patient preference of indoor, simulated, or artificial daylight photodynamic therapy versus conventional lamp-based photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis},
  author = {Nouf M. Al-Otaibi and Merwi S. Alhadeyah and Abdulmuhsin H. Al-Rashid and Malak A. Alshamali and Reema Mohammad Aldhafeeri and Shaan AlGhanim and Alaa J. Alsaleh and Jood W. Almutairi and Danah T.H.Z. Almutairi and Abdullah M. Alharran},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy},
  doi = {10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Efficacy, tolerability, and patient preference of indoor, simulated, or artificial daylight photodynamic therapy versus conventional lamp-based photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU  - Nouf M. Al-Otaibi
AU  - Merwi S. Alhadeyah
AU  - Abdulmuhsin H. Al-Rashid
AU  - Malak A. Alshamali
AU  - Reema Mohammad Aldhafeeri
AU  - Shaan AlGhanim
AU  - Alaa J. Alsaleh
AU  - Jood W. Almutairi
AU  - Danah T.H.Z. Almutairi
AU  - Abdullah M. Alharran
PY  - 2026
JO  - Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
DO  - 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643
ER  -

APA

Al-Otaibi, N. M., Alhadeyah, M. S., Al-Rashid, A. H., Alshamali, M. A., Aldhafeeri, R. M., AlGhanim, S., Alsaleh, A. J., Almutairi, J. W., Almutairi, D. T., & Alharran, A. M. (2026). Efficacy, tolerability, and patient preference of indoor, simulated, or artificial daylight photodynamic therapy versus conventional lamp-based photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105643

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:56:37.359Z