No evidence of significant natural environmental exposure to arsenic, but lead and manganese for Napoleon I on the island of Saint Helena (1815-1821).

Charlier P, Charlier J, Djebrani Oussedik N, Poupon J

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010
Published
2026 Sep
Container
Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010,
  title = {No evidence of significant natural environmental exposure to arsenic, but lead and manganese for Napoleon I on the island of Saint Helena (1815-1821).},
  author = {Charlier P and Charlier J and Djebrani Oussedik N and Poupon J},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Annales pharmaceutiques francaises},
  doi = {10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - No evidence of significant natural environmental exposure to arsenic, but lead and manganese for Napoleon I on the island of Saint Helena (1815-1821).
AU  - Charlier P
AU  - Charlier J
AU  - Djebrani Oussedik N
AU  - Poupon J
PY  - 2026
JO  - Annales pharmaceutiques francaises
DO  - 10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010
ER  - 

APA

P, C., J, C., N, D. O., & J, P. (2026). No evidence of significant natural environmental exposure to arsenic, but lead and manganese for Napoleon I on the island of Saint Helena (1815-1821).. Annales pharmaceutiques francaises. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2026.06.010

Source records