Chemical vs thermal accelerated hydrolytic degradation of 3D-printed PLLA/PLCL bioresorbable stents: Characterization and influence of sterilization

Victor Chausse, Clàudia Iglesias, Elisabeth Bou-Petit, Maria-Pau Ginebra, Marta Pegueroles

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817
Published
2023-01
Container
Polymer Testing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817,
  title = {Chemical vs thermal accelerated hydrolytic degradation of 3D-printed PLLA/PLCL bioresorbable stents: Characterization and influence of sterilization},
  author = {Victor Chausse and Clàudia Iglesias and Elisabeth Bou-Petit and Maria-Pau Ginebra and Marta Pegueroles},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Polymer Testing},
  doi = {10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Chemical vs thermal accelerated hydrolytic degradation of 3D-printed PLLA/PLCL bioresorbable stents: Characterization and influence of sterilization
AU  - Victor Chausse
AU  - Clàudia Iglesias
AU  - Elisabeth Bou-Petit
AU  - Maria-Pau Ginebra
AU  - Marta Pegueroles
PY  - 2023
JO  - Polymer Testing
DO  - 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817
ER  - 

APA

Chausse, V., Iglesias, C., Bou-Petit, E., Ginebra, M., & Pegueroles, M. (2023). Chemical vs thermal accelerated hydrolytic degradation of 3D-printed PLLA/PLCL bioresorbable stents: Characterization and influence of sterilization. Polymer Testing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107817

Source records