An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches—A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002
- Published
- 2012-03
- Container
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002,
title = {An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches—A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant},
author = {L. Gooijer and N. Cornil and C.L. Lenoble},
year = {2012},
journal = {Process Safety and Environmental Protection},
doi = {10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches—A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant AU - L. Gooijer AU - N. Cornil AU - C.L. Lenoble PY - 2012 JO - Process Safety and Environmental Protection DO - 10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002 ER -
APA
Gooijer, L., Cornil, N., & Lenoble, C. (2012). An international comparison of four quantitative risk assessment approaches—A benchmark study based on a fictitious LPG plant. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2011.05.002
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T18:12:25.156Z