What do the revised UK standards of proficiency mean for diagnostic radiography training? A regional radiographer focus group study.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007
- Published
- 2024 Jan
- Container
- Radiography (London, England : 1995)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007,
title = {What do the revised UK standards of proficiency mean for diagnostic radiography training? A regional radiographer focus group study.},
author = {Wilkinson E and Gill A and Hardy M},
year = {2024},
journal = {Radiography (London, England : 1995)},
doi = {10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - What do the revised UK standards of proficiency mean for diagnostic radiography training? A regional radiographer focus group study. AU - Wilkinson E AU - Gill A AU - Hardy M PY - 2024 JO - Radiography (London, England : 1995) DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007 ER -
APA
E, W., A, G., & M, H. (2024). What do the revised UK standards of proficiency mean for diagnostic radiography training? A regional radiographer focus group study.. Radiography (London, England : 1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.007
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:15:23.980Z