Comparing coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography for percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565
- Published
- 2026-10
- Container
- Radiography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565,
title = {Comparing coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography for percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis},
author = {S. Saeed and M.A. Ali and M. Osama and A. Khan and M.H. Waseem and U. Alam and S. Ali and M. Hudaib and A. Shoaib and Z.ul Abideen and S. Khan and M. Siddique and M.E.U. Rehman},
year = {2026},
journal = {Radiography},
doi = {10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography for percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis AU - S. Saeed AU - M.A. Ali AU - M. Osama AU - A. Khan AU - M.H. Waseem AU - U. Alam AU - S. Ali AU - M. Hudaib AU - A. Shoaib AU - Z.ul Abideen AU - S. Khan AU - M. Siddique AU - M.E.U. Rehman PY - 2026 JO - Radiography DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565 ER -
APA
Saeed, S., Ali, M., Osama, M., Khan, A., Waseem, M., Alam, U., Ali, S., Hudaib, M., Shoaib, A., Abideen, Z., Khan, S., Siddique, M., & Rehman, M. (2026). Comparing coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography for percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis. Radiography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2026.103565
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:42:02.563Z