Comparative detection performance of PET and conventional scintigraphy tracers for inflammation and infection in bone and soft tissue: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341
- Published
- 2026 Aug 31
- Container
- Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341,
title = {Comparative detection performance of PET and conventional scintigraphy tracers for inflammation and infection in bone and soft tissue: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.},
author = {Wang HN and Huang CK and Huang YE and Huang YT and Chan SH and Tseng JR},
year = {2026},
journal = {Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular},
doi = {10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative detection performance of PET and conventional scintigraphy tracers for inflammation and infection in bone and soft tissue: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. AU - Wang HN AU - Huang CK AU - Huang YE AU - Huang YT AU - Chan SH AU - Tseng JR PY - 2026 JO - Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular DO - 10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341 ER -
APA
HN, W., CK, H., YE, H., YT, H., SH, C., & JR, T. (2026). Comparative detection performance of PET and conventional scintigraphy tracers for inflammation and infection in bone and soft tissue: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2026.500341
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:32:08.618Z