Reply to letter to the editor: "Beyond clinical outcomes: why implementation science matters for double sequential defibrillation".

Dicker B, Hutchinson H, Todd VF, Garcia E, Maessen S

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212
Published
2026 Jul 16
Container
Resuscitation
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212,
  title = {Reply to letter to the editor: "Beyond clinical outcomes: why implementation science matters for double sequential defibrillation".},
  author = {Dicker B and Hutchinson H and Todd VF and Garcia E and Maessen S},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Resuscitation},
  doi = {10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reply to letter to the editor: "Beyond clinical outcomes: why implementation science matters for double sequential defibrillation".
AU  - Dicker B
AU  - Hutchinson H
AU  - Todd VF
AU  - Garcia E
AU  - Maessen S
PY  - 2026
JO  - Resuscitation
DO  - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212
ER  - 

APA

B, D., H, H., VF, T., E, G., & S, M. (2026). Reply to letter to the editor: "Beyond clinical outcomes: why implementation science matters for double sequential defibrillation".. Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111212

Source records