Pulseless electrical activity versus asystole as initial pulseless rhythm in children: challenging convention regarding non-shockable rhythms.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289,
title = {Pulseless electrical activity versus asystole as initial pulseless rhythm in children: challenging convention regarding non-shockable rhythms.},
author = {Wong R and Lasa JJ and Topjian A and Joyner BL Jr and Jiang T and Li Y and Zhao J and Guerguerian AM and Nadkarni V and Raymond T and American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines®-Resuscitation Investigators},
year = {2026},
journal = {Resuscitation},
doi = {10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Pulseless electrical activity versus asystole as initial pulseless rhythm in children: challenging convention regarding non-shockable rhythms. AU - Wong R AU - Lasa JJ AU - Topjian A AU - Joyner BL Jr AU - Jiang T AU - Li Y AU - Zhao J AU - Guerguerian AM AU - Nadkarni V AU - Raymond T AU - American Heart Association Get with the Guidelines®-Resuscitation Investigators PY - 2026 JO - Resuscitation DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289 ER -
APA
R, W., JJ, L., A, T., Jr, J. B., T, J., Y, L., J, Z., AM, G., V, N., T, R., & Investigators, A. H. A. G. W. T. G. (2026). Pulseless electrical activity versus asystole as initial pulseless rhythm in children: challenging convention regarding non-shockable rhythms.. Resuscitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111289
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:49:58.626Z