[National ranking examination four years after its implementation: thoughts].
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021
- Published
- 2008-04-09
- Container
- Rev Med Interne
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021,
title = {[National ranking examination four years after its implementation: thoughts].},
author = {Duhaut P.},
year = {2008},
journal = {Rev Med Interne},
doi = {10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - [National ranking examination four years after its implementation: thoughts]. AU - Duhaut P. PY - 2008 JO - Rev Med Interne DO - 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021 ER -
APA
P., D. (2008). [National ranking examination four years after its implementation: thoughts].. Rev Med Interne. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmed.2008.02.021
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:06:25.209Z