Performance of three consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Sleep medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059,
title = {Performance of three consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with Actigraphy and Polysomnography.},
author = {Alhejaili F and Alshumrani R and Alamoudi W and Wali S and Bamagoos A and Wazira L and Ahmad H and Azab E and Banjer H and Alzahrani A and Baghdadi E and Gozal D},
year = {2026},
journal = {Sleep medicine},
doi = {10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Performance of three consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with Actigraphy and Polysomnography. AU - Alhejaili F AU - Alshumrani R AU - Alamoudi W AU - Wali S AU - Bamagoos A AU - Wazira L AU - Ahmad H AU - Azab E AU - Banjer H AU - Alzahrani A AU - Baghdadi E AU - Gozal D PY - 2026 JO - Sleep medicine DO - 10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059 ER -
APA
F, A., R, A., W, A., S, W., A, B., L, W., H, A., E, A., H, B., A, A., E, B., & D, G. (2026). Performance of three consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with Actigraphy and Polysomnography.. Sleep medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2026.109059
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:46:00.755Z