Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011
- Published
- 2015-03
- Container
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011,
title = {Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?},
author = {Eric N. Reither and Ryan K. Masters and Yang Claire Yang and Daniel A. Powers and Hui Zheng and Kenneth C. Land},
year = {2015},
journal = {Social Science \& Medicine},
doi = {10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s? AU - Eric N. Reither AU - Ryan K. Masters AU - Yang Claire Yang AU - Daniel A. Powers AU - Hui Zheng AU - Kenneth C. Land PY - 2015 JO - Social Science & Medicine DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011 ER -
APA
Reither, E. N., Masters, R. K., Yang, Y. C., Powers, D. A., Zheng, H., & Land, K. C. (2015). Should age-period-cohort studies return to the methodologies of the 1970s?. Social Science & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.011
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T14:37:51.441Z