The good participant paradox: BenevolentMisrepresentation as a response to research exclusion.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937
- Published
- 2026 Oct 26
- Container
- Social science & medicine (1982)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937,
title = {The good participant paradox: BenevolentMisrepresentation as a response to research exclusion.},
author = {Kramer ML and Bradbury M and Ho AK and Lamprecht E and Finlay KA},
year = {2026},
journal = {Social science \& medicine (1982)},
doi = {10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The good participant paradox: BenevolentMisrepresentation as a response to research exclusion. AU - Kramer ML AU - Bradbury M AU - Ho AK AU - Lamprecht E AU - Finlay KA PY - 2026 JO - Social science & medicine (1982) DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937 ER -
APA
ML, K., M, B., AK, H., E, L., & KA, F. (2026). The good participant paradox: BenevolentMisrepresentation as a response to research exclusion.. Social science & medicine (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119937
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:45:45.784Z