Large language models versus NASS common coding scenarios: an analysis of accuracy and financial implications using 2026 CPT AMA Codebook Guidelines.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011
- Published
- 2026 Aug 31
- Container
- The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011,
title = {Large language models versus NASS common coding scenarios: an analysis of accuracy and financial implications using 2026 CPT AMA Codebook Guidelines.},
author = {Fang CJ and Hii JL and Michelberger M and Mundo JD and Alexander I and Maitra S},
year = {2026},
journal = {The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society},
doi = {10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Large language models versus NASS common coding scenarios: an analysis of accuracy and financial implications using 2026 CPT AMA Codebook Guidelines. AU - Fang CJ AU - Hii JL AU - Michelberger M AU - Mundo JD AU - Alexander I AU - Maitra S PY - 2026 JO - The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011 ER -
APA
CJ, F., JL, H., M, M., JD, M., I, A., & S, M. (2026). Large language models versus NASS common coding scenarios: an analysis of accuracy and financial implications using 2026 CPT AMA Codebook Guidelines.. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.08.011
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T09:00:28.022Z