Professional practices put to the test of Open Dialogue: A case study in two public psychiatry services in Marseille
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796
- Published
- 2026-06
- Container
- Social Science and Humanities Open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796,
title = {Professional practices put to the test of Open Dialogue: A case study in two public psychiatry services in Marseille},
author = {Andréa Mestre and Julien Grard and Camille Grégoire and Hugo Panabières and Aurélie Tinland and Pascal Auquier and Saphir Desvignes},
year = {2026},
journal = {Social Science and Humanities Open},
doi = {10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Professional practices put to the test of Open Dialogue: A case study in two public psychiatry services in Marseille AU - Andréa Mestre AU - Julien Grard AU - Camille Grégoire AU - Hugo Panabières AU - Aurélie Tinland AU - Pascal Auquier AU - Saphir Desvignes PY - 2026 JO - Social Science and Humanities Open DO - 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796 ER -
APA
Mestre, A., Grard, J., Grégoire, C., Panabières, H., Tinland, A., Auquier, P., & Desvignes, S. (2026). Professional practices put to the test of Open Dialogue: A case study in two public psychiatry services in Marseille. Social Science and Humanities Open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102796
Source records
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:10:41.205Z