Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing and non-sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of postoperative incontinence, pain, and quality of life.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469
- Published
- 2026 Jul 20
- Container
- Surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469,
title = {Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing and non-sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of postoperative incontinence, pain, and quality of life.},
author = {Zoghbi MS and Hamade L and Itani D and El Zibaoui Y and Moussally M and Gorgun E},
year = {2026},
journal = {Surgery},
doi = {10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing and non-sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of postoperative incontinence, pain, and quality of life. AU - Zoghbi MS AU - Hamade L AU - Itani D AU - El Zibaoui Y AU - Moussally M AU - Gorgun E PY - 2026 JO - Surgery DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469 ER -
APA
MS, Z., L, H., D, I., Y, E. Z., M, M., & E, G. (2026). Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing and non-sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of postoperative incontinence, pain, and quality of life.. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2026.110469
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T01:32:21.265Z