Electronic consultations with Video Supported PowerPoint versus in-clinic face-to-face, pre-travel consultations: A single-centre, comparative analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556
- Published
- 2020 Jan-Feb
- Container
- Travel medicine and infectious disease
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556,
title = {Electronic consultations with Video Supported PowerPoint versus in-clinic face-to-face, pre-travel consultations: A single-centre, comparative analysis.},
author = {Virk A and Jayawant M and Springer DJ and Kasten MJ},
year = {2020},
journal = {Travel medicine and infectious disease},
doi = {10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Electronic consultations with Video Supported PowerPoint versus in-clinic face-to-face, pre-travel consultations: A single-centre, comparative analysis. AU - Virk A AU - Jayawant M AU - Springer DJ AU - Kasten MJ PY - 2020 JO - Travel medicine and infectious disease DO - 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556 ER -
APA
A, V., M, J., DJ, S., & MJ, K. (2020). Electronic consultations with Video Supported PowerPoint versus in-clinic face-to-face, pre-travel consultations: A single-centre, comparative analysis.. Travel medicine and infectious disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101556
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:04:10.703Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:04:10.741Z