Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001
- Published
- 2019
- Container
- Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001,
title = {Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review.},
author = {Goerdten J and Čukić I and Danso SO and Carrière I and Muniz-Terrera G},
year = {2019},
journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia (New York, N. Y.)},
doi = {10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review. AU - Goerdten J AU - Čukić I AU - Danso SO AU - Carrière I AU - Muniz-Terrera G PY - 2019 JO - Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) DO - 10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001 ER -
APA
J, G., I, Č., SO, D., I, C., & G, M. (2019). Statistical methods for dementia risk prediction and recommendations for future work: A systematic review.. Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.08.001
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:34:01.684Z