Effectiveness of tick sampling methods in the field: A systematic scoping review.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Ticks and tick-borne diseases
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682,
title = {Effectiveness of tick sampling methods in the field: A systematic scoping review.},
author = {Audet-Legault R and Hainault J and Desrochers-Plourde CA and Dumas A and Rocheleau JP and Leighton PA and Bouchard C and Aenishaenslin C},
year = {2026},
journal = {Ticks and tick-borne diseases},
doi = {10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Effectiveness of tick sampling methods in the field: A systematic scoping review. AU - Audet-Legault R AU - Hainault J AU - Desrochers-Plourde CA AU - Dumas A AU - Rocheleau JP AU - Leighton PA AU - Bouchard C AU - Aenishaenslin C PY - 2026 JO - Ticks and tick-borne diseases DO - 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682 ER -
APA
R, A., J, H., CA, D., A, D., JP, R., PA, L., C, B., & C, A. (2026). Effectiveness of tick sampling methods in the field: A systematic scoping review.. Ticks and tick-borne diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2026.102682
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:12:53.218Z