Global Practices for Reprocessing Endocavity Ultrasound Transducers: Insights From a WFUMB Survey.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013
- Published
- 2026 Jun
- Container
- Ultrasound in medicine & biology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013,
title = {Global Practices for Reprocessing Endocavity Ultrasound Transducers: Insights From a WFUMB Survey.},
author = {Westerway SC and Basseal JM and Moran C and WFUMB Safety Committee},
year = {2026},
journal = {Ultrasound in medicine \& biology},
doi = {10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Global Practices for Reprocessing Endocavity Ultrasound Transducers: Insights From a WFUMB Survey. AU - Westerway SC AU - Basseal JM AU - Moran C AU - WFUMB Safety Committee PY - 2026 JO - Ultrasound in medicine & biology DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013 ER -
APA
SC, W., JM, B., C, M., & Committee, W. S. (2026). Global Practices for Reprocessing Endocavity Ultrasound Transducers: Insights From a WFUMB Survey.. Ultrasound in medicine & biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.01.013
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:43:04.425Z