Outcome-related nonresponse bias, not systematic misreporting, explains overestimation of vaccine uptake in COVID-19 surveys

August Eie Albertsen, Anton Hvidberg Munch, Michael Bang Petersen, Kim Mannemar Sønderskov

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315
Published
2027-01
Container
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315,
  title = {Outcome-related nonresponse bias, not systematic misreporting, explains overestimation of vaccine uptake in COVID-19 surveys},
  author = {August Eie Albertsen and Anton Hvidberg Munch and Michael Bang Petersen and Kim Mannemar Sønderskov},
  year = {2027},
  journal = {Vaccine},
  doi = {10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Outcome-related nonresponse bias, not systematic misreporting, explains overestimation of vaccine uptake in COVID-19 surveys
AU  - August Eie Albertsen
AU  - Anton Hvidberg Munch
AU  - Michael Bang Petersen
AU  - Kim Mannemar Sønderskov
PY  - 2027
JO  - Vaccine
DO  - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315
ER  - 

APA

Albertsen, A. E., Munch, A. H., Petersen, M. B., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2027). Outcome-related nonresponse bias, not systematic misreporting, explains overestimation of vaccine uptake in COVID-19 surveys. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129315

Source records