Comparison of short nasal swab and deep nasopharyngeal swab sampling methods to describe BRD-associated viruses and bacteria detected using a metagenomics approach optimized for virus recovery in fall-placed beef calves shortly after feedlot arrival
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609
- Published
- 2026-06
- Container
- Veterinary and Animal Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609,
title = {Comparison of short nasal swab and deep nasopharyngeal swab sampling methods to describe BRD-associated viruses and bacteria detected using a metagenomics approach optimized for virus recovery in fall-placed beef calves shortly after feedlot arrival},
author = {Emmanuel Donbraye and Lianne McLeod and Zhijian Chai and Stacey R. Lacoste and E. Luke McCarthy and Matthew G. Links and Cheryl L. Waldner},
year = {2026},
journal = {Veterinary and Animal Science},
doi = {10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of short nasal swab and deep nasopharyngeal swab sampling methods to describe BRD-associated viruses and bacteria detected using a metagenomics approach optimized for virus recovery in fall-placed beef calves shortly after feedlot arrival AU - Emmanuel Donbraye AU - Lianne McLeod AU - Zhijian Chai AU - Stacey R. Lacoste AU - E. Luke McCarthy AU - Matthew G. Links AU - Cheryl L. Waldner PY - 2026 JO - Veterinary and Animal Science DO - 10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609 ER -
APA
Donbraye, E., McLeod, L., Chai, Z., Lacoste, S. R., McCarthy, E. L., Links, M. G., & Waldner, C. L. (2026). Comparison of short nasal swab and deep nasopharyngeal swab sampling methods to describe BRD-associated viruses and bacteria detected using a metagenomics approach optimized for virus recovery in fall-placed beef calves shortly after feedlot arrival. Veterinary and Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2026.100609
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:09:51.358Z