Commentary on “Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference”
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905
- Published
- 2026-09
- Container
- North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905,
title = {Commentary on “Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference”},
author = {Thomas Bieganowski and Zorica Buser},
year = {2026},
journal = {North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)},
doi = {10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Commentary on “Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference” AU - Thomas Bieganowski AU - Zorica Buser PY - 2026 JO - North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ) DO - 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905 ER -
APA
Bieganowski, T., & Buser, Z. (2026). Commentary on “Which spine surgery techniques are most appealing to the public? A survey examining public perception of spine surgery techniques and factors associated with procedure preference”. North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100905
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T22:46:40.921Z