Benchmarking AI: comparing a fully automated spinal motion solution to a validated analyst-driven technology.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936
- Published
- 2026 Dec
- Container
- North American Spine Society journal
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936,
title = {Benchmarking AI: comparing a fully automated spinal motion solution to a validated analyst-driven technology.},
author = {Coomer SC and Hipp JA and Chaput CD and Owens WJ and Newman P and Grieco TF},
year = {2026},
journal = {North American Spine Society journal},
doi = {10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Benchmarking AI: comparing a fully automated spinal motion solution to a validated analyst-driven technology. AU - Coomer SC AU - Hipp JA AU - Chaput CD AU - Owens WJ AU - Newman P AU - Grieco TF PY - 2026 JO - North American Spine Society journal DO - 10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936 ER -
APA
SC, C., JA, H., CD, C., WJ, O., P, N., & TF, G. (2026). Benchmarking AI: comparing a fully automated spinal motion solution to a validated analyst-driven technology.. North American Spine Society journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2026.100936
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:56:01.348Z