Why do primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mason TW, Lauck BJ, Glover MA, Recker AJ, Reynolds AW, Trasolini NA, Waterman BR, van der List JP

Open source

DOI
10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855
Published
2026 Nov
Container
JSES reviews, reports, and techniques
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855,
  title = {Why do primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review and meta-analysis.},
  author = {Mason TW and Lauck BJ and Glover MA and Recker AJ and Reynolds AW and Trasolini NA and Waterman BR and van der List JP},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {JSES reviews, reports, and techniques},
  doi = {10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why do primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU  - Mason TW
AU  - Lauck BJ
AU  - Glover MA
AU  - Recker AJ
AU  - Reynolds AW
AU  - Trasolini NA
AU  - Waterman BR
AU  - van der List JP
PY  - 2026
JO  - JSES reviews, reports, and techniques
DO  - 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855
ER  - 

APA

TW, M., BJ, L., MA, G., AJ, R., AW, R., NA, T., BR, W., & JP, V. D. L. (2026). Why do primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review and meta-analysis.. JSES reviews, reports, and techniques. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100855

Source records