Pro and con: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management∗∗This article represents one side of a debate regarding the role of lipid subfractions in cardiovascular risk management; the opposing argument can be found in the accompanying article by Gerd Assmann, MD.

Terje R Pedersen

Open source

DOI
10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7
Published
2001-03
Container
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0002-9149-01-01449-7,
  title = {Pro and con: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management∗∗This article represents one side of a debate regarding the role of lipid subfractions in cardiovascular risk management; the opposing argument can be found in the accompanying article by Gerd Assmann, MD.},
  author = {Terje R Pedersen},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {The American Journal of Cardiology},
  doi = {10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pro and con: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management∗∗This article represents one side of a debate regarding the role of lipid subfractions in cardiovascular risk management; the opposing argument can be found in the accompanying article by Gerd Assmann, MD.
AU  - Terje R Pedersen
PY  - 2001
JO  - The American Journal of Cardiology
DO  - 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7
ER  - 

APA

Pedersen, T. R. (2001). Pro and con: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering is and will be the key to the future of lipid management∗∗This article represents one side of a debate regarding the role of lipid subfractions in cardiovascular risk management; the opposing argument can be found in the accompanying article by Gerd Assmann, MD.. The American Journal of Cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01449-7

Source records