[Ultrasonic method compared with the Soxhlet method of extraction for atmospheric polycyclic hydrocarbons].

Chatot G, Castegnaro M, Roche JL, Fontanges R

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5
Published: 1971 Feb
Container: Analytica chimica acta
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0003-2670-01-82084-5,
  title = {[Ultrasonic method compared with the Soxhlet method of extraction for atmospheric polycyclic hydrocarbons].},
  author = {Chatot G and Castegnaro M and Roche JL and Fontanges R},
  year = {1971},
  journal = {Analytica chimica acta},
  doi = {10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Ultrasonic method compared with the Soxhlet method of extraction for atmospheric polycyclic hydrocarbons].
AU  - Chatot G
AU  - Castegnaro M
AU  - Roche JL
AU  - Fontanges R
PY  - 1971
JO  - Analytica chimica acta
DO  - 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5
ER  -

APA

G, C., M, C., JL, R., & R, F. (1971). [Ultrasonic method compared with the Soxhlet method of extraction for atmospheric polycyclic hydrocarbons].. Analytica chimica acta. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82084-5

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:07:46.690Z