A paired comparison study of the effects of a breathable feminine hygiene pantiliner versus a traditional non‐breathable pantiliner on reducing skin hydration and relative humidity
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9
- Published
- 2000-01
- Container
- International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s0020-7292-00-80652-9,
title = {A paired comparison study of the effects of a breathable feminine hygiene pantiliner versus a traditional non‐breathable pantiliner on reducing skin hydration and relative humidity},
author = {A. Kanti and M. Bramante and S. Wang‐Weigand and M. Roddy and F. Sarbaugh and A. Theil and E. Bookland},
year = {2000},
journal = {International Journal of Gynecology \& Obstetrics},
doi = {10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A paired comparison study of the effects of a breathable feminine hygiene pantiliner versus a traditional non‐breathable pantiliner on reducing skin hydration and relative humidity AU - A. Kanti AU - M. Bramante AU - S. Wang‐Weigand AU - M. Roddy AU - F. Sarbaugh AU - A. Theil AU - E. Bookland PY - 2000 JO - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics DO - 10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9 ER -
APA
Kanti, A., Bramante, M., Wang‐Weigand, S., Roddy, M., Sarbaugh, F., Theil, A., & Bookland, E. (2000). A paired comparison study of the effects of a breathable feminine hygiene pantiliner versus a traditional non‐breathable pantiliner on reducing skin hydration and relative humidity. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(00)80652-9
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:30:56.662Z