[Determination of Du factor using Groupamatic. Comparison with manual technics. Report of 203,240 determinations].

Garretta M, Muller A, Gener J

DOI: 10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0
Published: 1974 Sep
Container: Revue francaise de transfusion
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0035-2977-74-80021-0,
  title = {[Determination of Du factor using Groupamatic. Comparison with manual technics. Report of 203,240 determinations].},
  author = {Garretta M and Muller A and Gener J},
  year = {1974},
  journal = {Revue francaise de transfusion},
  doi = {10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Determination of Du factor using Groupamatic. Comparison with manual technics. Report of 203,240 determinations].
AU  - Garretta M
AU  - Muller A
AU  - Gener J
PY  - 1974
JO  - Revue francaise de transfusion
DO  - 10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0
ER  -

APA

M, G., A, M., & J, G. (1974). [Determination of Du factor using Groupamatic. Comparison with manual technics. Report of 203,240 determinations].. Revue francaise de transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-2977(74)80021-0

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:16:16.960Z