Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches

Michel Soulié, Mathieu Thoulouzan, Philippe Seguin, Patrick Mouly, Nicolas Vazzoler, Francis Pontonnier, Pierre Plante

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7
Published: 2001-03
Container: Urology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0090-4295-00-01065-7,
  title = {Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches},
  author = {Michel Soulié and Mathieu Thoulouzan and Philippe Seguin and Patrick Mouly and Nicolas Vazzoler and Francis Pontonnier and Pierre Plante},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {Urology},
  doi = {10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches
AU  - Michel Soulié
AU  - Mathieu Thoulouzan
AU  - Philippe Seguin
AU  - Patrick Mouly
AU  - Nicolas Vazzoler
AU  - Francis Pontonnier
AU  - Pierre Plante
PY  - 2001
JO  - Urology
DO  - 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7
ER  -

APA

Soulié, M., Thoulouzan, M., Seguin, P., Mouly, P., Vazzoler, N., Pontonnier, F., & Plante, P. (2001). Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01065-7

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:17:02.580Z