Misconduct persists: is it time to connect the dots?

Author unknown

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7
Published: 2001-11
Container: The Journal of Academic Librarianship
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 58/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0099-1333-01-00256-7,
  title = {Misconduct persists: is it time to connect the dots?},
  year = {2001},
  journal = {The Journal of Academic Librarianship},
  doi = {10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Misconduct persists: is it time to connect the dots?
PY  - 2001
JO  - The Journal of Academic Librarianship
DO  - 10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7
ER  -

APA

Misconduct persists: is it time to connect the dots?. (2001). The Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00256-7

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:27:27.959Z