Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial.

Weaver WD, Reisman MA, Griffin JJ, Buller CE, Leimgruber PP, Henry T, D'Haem C, Clark VL, Martin JS, Cohen DJ, Neil N, Every NR

Open source

DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x
Published: 2000 Jun 24
Container: Lancet (London, England)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-00-02403-x,
  title = {Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial.},
  author = {Weaver WD and Reisman MA and Griffin JJ and Buller CE and Leimgruber PP and Henry T and D'Haem C and Clark VL and Martin JS and Cohen DJ and Neil N and Every NR},
  year = {2000},
  journal = {Lancet (London, England)},
  doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial.
AU  - Weaver WD
AU  - Reisman MA
AU  - Griffin JJ
AU  - Buller CE
AU  - Leimgruber PP
AU  - Henry T
AU  - D'Haem C
AU  - Clark VL
AU  - Martin JS
AU  - Cohen DJ
AU  - Neil N
AU  - Every NR
PY  - 2000
JO  - Lancet (London, England)
DO  - 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x
ER  -

APA

WD, W., MA, R., JJ, G., CE, B., PP, L., T, H., C, D., VL, C., JS, M., DJ, C., N, N., & NR, E. (2000). Optimum percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty compared with routine stent strategy trial (OPUS-1): a randomised trial.. Lancet (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02403-x

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:12:27.994Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:12:28.005Z