Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
- Published
- 2022 Nov 12
- Container
- Lancet (London, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-22-01188-6,
title = {Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.},
author = {Compérat E and Amin MB and Cathomas R and Choudhury A and De Santis M and Kamat A and Stenzl A and Thoeny HC and Witjes JA},
year = {2022},
journal = {Lancet (London, England)},
doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments. AU - Compérat E AU - Amin MB AU - Cathomas R AU - Choudhury A AU - De Santis M AU - Kamat A AU - Stenzl A AU - Thoeny HC AU - Witjes JA PY - 2022 JO - Lancet (London, England) DO - 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6 ER -
APA
E, C., MB, A., R, C., A, C., M, D. S., A, K., A, S., HC, T., & JA, W. (2022). Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.. Lancet (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:33:45.807Z