Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.

Compérat E, Amin MB, Cathomas R, Choudhury A, De Santis M, Kamat A, Stenzl A, Thoeny HC, Witjes JA

Open source

DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
Published
2022 Nov 12
Container
Lancet (London, England)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-22-01188-6,
  title = {Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.},
  author = {Compérat E and Amin MB and Cathomas R and Choudhury A and De Santis M and Kamat A and Stenzl A and Thoeny HC and Witjes JA},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Lancet (London, England)},
  doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.
AU  - Compérat E
AU  - Amin MB
AU  - Cathomas R
AU  - Choudhury A
AU  - De Santis M
AU  - Kamat A
AU  - Stenzl A
AU  - Thoeny HC
AU  - Witjes JA
PY  - 2022
JO  - Lancet (London, England)
DO  - 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
ER  - 

APA

E, C., MB, A., R, C., A, C., M, D. S., A, K., A, S., HC, T., & JA, W. (2022). Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments.. Lancet (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6

Source records