Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
- Published
- 2022-11
- Container
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1016/s0140-6736-22-01188-6,
title = {Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments},
author = {Eva Compérat and Mahul B Amin and Richard Cathomas and Ananya Choudhury and Maria De Santis and Ashish Kamat and Arnulf Stenzl and Harriet C Thoeny and Johannes Alfred Witjes},
year = {2022},
journal = {The Lancet},
doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments AU - Eva Compérat AU - Mahul B Amin AU - Richard Cathomas AU - Ananya Choudhury AU - Maria De Santis AU - Ashish Kamat AU - Arnulf Stenzl AU - Harriet C Thoeny AU - Johannes Alfred Witjes PY - 2022 JO - The Lancet DO - 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6 ER -
APA
Compérat, E., Amin, M. B., Cathomas, R., Choudhury, A., Santis, M. D., Kamat, A., Stenzl, A., Thoeny, H. C., & Witjes, J. A. (2022). Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01188-6
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T19:26:43.598Z